Updated FAQs - 6 May 2026

Has the event been approved?

• The event will primarily operate Wednesday to Sunday
• Show times will generally be between 6:00pm and 9:00pm weekdays and
• between 6:00pm and 9:30pm weekends

Updated FAQs - 5 May 2026

What's the City’s position on damage and anti-social behaviour as a form of protest at Jorgensen Park?

• littering
• wilful damage to property
• safety risks for workers and the public
• obstruction of authorised works

What does the ecological assessment say about the environmental impact of the proposed event?

Environmental considerations, including potential impacts on matters of national environmental significance (MNES) such as the Carnaby’s cockatoo, have been a key focus throughout the assessment process.

While the ecological assessment is not owned by the City and therefore cannot be shared in full, we are able to provide a summary of the key findings.

The report concludes that:

• The event will utilise existing trails only
• It is temporary in nature
• Lighting and sound have been specifically designed to minimise disturbance to wildlife and will comply with the National Light Pollution Guidelines for Wildlife
• Key habitat features will be protected, including hollow-bearing trees, understorey and refuge areas
• Tree protection zones have been identified and will be avoided
• Provided all recommended mitigation measures are implemented and monitored

Overall, the report finds that key ecological values can be protected and that there will be no long-term impacts to the area.

The report also includes recommendations relating to biosecurity and hygiene, with a particular focus on managing Phytophthora (dieback).

An independent third-party ecological review is currently underway. In addition, an ornithologist will undertake their first site visit with the City and Site Manager this week.

The additional independent environmental review has not been initiated because the City lacks confidence in its own processes or the proponent’s technical report. It is standard practice for proponents to engage suitably qualified specialists to undertake detailed environmental assessments, and these are then reviewed by the City’s officers as part of a broader assessment process.

Given the high level of community interest and the concerns raised about independence, the City has chosen to commission a third-party review and seek input from additional specialists, such as an ornithologist with expertise in black cockatoo behaviour and habitat.

We acknowledge that there are differing views within the community, including some concerns about perceived bias. The independent review is intended to help address those concerns by ensuring the assessment is considered objectively and can be validated by an external party.

---

Updated FAQs - 23 April 2026

Has the lease been signed?

The City has now executed the lease and associated licence agreements for the proposed use of the site.

As the land is Crown land, the lease is subject to consent under Section 18 of the Land Administration Act 1997. This is the next step in the process.

The proposal cannot proceed unless consent under Section 18 is granted and all other required approvals are in place.

---

Updated FAQs - 22 April 2026

Which agencies has the City consulted as part of this process?

The City has been liaising with a range of relevant State and Federal agencies as part of its assessment of the proposal.

These include:

• Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH)
  
  • The Administration is satisfied that the proposed event is consistent with clause 29(1)(f)(v) and an exemption applies under the MRS
  • The City discussed the proposal regarding the potential requirement for development approval with senior officers at the Department of Planning, Lands, and Heritage prior to confirming its interpretation of the planning framework
    
• Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER)
  • Ongoing discussions regarding the site’s location within a Priority 1 (P1) Public Drinking Water Source Area
• Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES)
  • The event is proposed to occur during the lower bushfire risk season
  • Standard procedures under the Bush Fires Act 1954 would apply in the event of a bushfire
• Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW)
  • A self-assessment has been undertaken
  • The ecological assessment and proposed mitigation measures are currently undergoing independent peer review
• Department of Health (DoH)
  • Review of relevant event documentation is being undertaken
• Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA)
  • Ongoing consultation

All agency feedback will be considered as part of the City’s decision-making process.

Does the proposed event require development approval?

The City has considered whether development approval is required under the planning framework.

Under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS), certain uses on reserved land may be exempt from requiring development approval.

The City has discussed the proposal with senior officers at the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) to confirm the appropriate interpretation of the planning framework.

Based on this advice, the City is satisfied that the proposed event is consistent with clause 29(1)(f)(v) of the MRS, and that an exemption from development approval applies.

This advice has also been provided to the event proponent.

Notwithstanding this, the proposal remains subject to other approvals and requirements, including lease approval and event management planning.

Is there a Management Plan for Jorgensen Park?

Yes. Jorgensen Park is guided by the Jorgensen Park Management Plan (2008).

This plan outlines how the area is to be managed, including conservation, recreation, and land use considerations.

In 2008, Council endorsed the Management Plan and resolved to:

• support the transfer of conservation areas to what is now the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA), to be incorporated into Kalamunda National Park
• seek a Management Order over the recreation areas of the park
• request endorsement of the Management Plan by the Western Australian Planning Commission
• retain the ability for the City (then Shire of Kalamunda) to lease land where appropriate, in accordance with the Management Order

The objectives and strategies within the Management Plan continue to guide how the park is used and managed today.

Any proposal for use of the park must be considered in line with this Management Plan and relevant statutory approval processes.

👉 You can view the Jorgensen Park Management Plan here. 

---

Updated FAQs - 20 April 2026

Can you confirm whether Council can delegate to the CEO the power to lease a Managed Crown Land reserve (vested in the City) for an extended, exclusive commercial event? (As you agreed, this lease requires Ministerial approval). Please indicate which relevant statutory requirement is applicable? 

The City can consider a short-term lease of managed Crown land where the management order permits leasing and Ministerial consent is obtained under sections 18 and 19 of the Land Administration Act 1997. The CEO already holds delegated authority to execute leases and licences (LGA3); however, given the nature of this proposal, it was considered appropriate for Council to formally consider the matter.

When will DPLH receive the lease application from the City?

DPLH has been made aware of the proposal. Any formal request for Ministerial consent will be progressed once the City has completed its assessment and has the supporting information required to do so.

Can you please explain how allowing an extended exclusive commercial event (ticketed for private entertainment) in a Crown Land Managed reserve aligns with the reserve purpose, of Recreation and Conservation? 

The proposed lease area is a Class ‘C’ Regional Reserve - Purpose: Recreation and Conservation - to protect the natural environment, provide recreational and cultural opportunities, safeguard important landscapes and sites of cultural or historical significance and provide for public access. 

Can you confirm whether the proposed two Unallocated Crown Land (UCL)s require a lease or licence approval for exclusive commercial use by Kzemos? 

The proposal requires access to portions of UCL Lot 505 on Deposited Plan 62578 and an adjoining untitled UCL Lot (PIN 213986). Yes, a separate licence is required to use these land parcels. The licence has been received, which is issued by the State as the landowner.

Under which specific statutory requirement does this fall?

Use of the adjacent UCL land requires separate authorisation under the Land Administration Act 1997, as that land is owned and managed by the State.

Why was reference to one of the UCLs (Lot 505) initially on the City's FAQs website, but deleted when the webpage was updated?

The reference was removed to clarify that the City is not the landowner or consent authority for that land, and that any licence is a matter for the State. 

Have licences been obtained by the City or Kzemos for use of each of the two UCLs?

Yes, a licence has been issued by the State for that purpose.

How does the adjoining Jorgensen Park use of  "Recreation and Conservation" mesh with the City's Council resolution regarding the proposed Native Title reserves from the OCM 26 Sept 2023 for the two UCLs proposed to be used for this exclusive commercial event? 

Note - The Council unanimously agreed to ask  DPLH these two UCLs remain designated for "Parks and Recreation", and noted the high conservation value and community perception. 

The UCL land remains State land and any licence over that land is a matter for the State. The City understands the State consulted with the Whadjuk Noongar Corporation before issuing a licence to access portions of UCL Lot 505 on Deposited Plan 62578 and an adjoining untitled UCL Lot (PIN 213986).  The City is aware of its earlier position regarding the broader planning intent for the area; however, the current proposal involves a temporary licence over a portion of the land parcels only and does not permanently change the land tenure or reservation purpose.

Were Councillors made aware of this (question above) prior to the OCM of 24/02/2026? 

Yes. Councillors were aware that the proposal involved adjacent UCL land, which was specifically outlined in the meeting agenda. That land is not under the City’s care or control and any licence over it is a matter for the State.

Do you acknowledge this extended exclusive commercial use will negatively impact the public's use and enjoyment of the Crown Land reserves? 

The City acknowledges that temporary restriction of access to part of the reserve would affect some regular users during the event period. The proposal relates to a defined portion of the reserve only, with the balance remaining accessible. The City is also considering how impacts on dog exercise, recreation and general park use can be minimised, including through continued access to the remainder of the reserve and other off-lead dog exercise areas nearby.

Given the high level of public interest and the proposed exclusive use of Crown Land reserves, will the full environmental impact report for this event will be made public for review and feedback?

The City recognises the high level of public interest in the environmental assessment. The City is currently considering what information can be made publicly available, noting that some limitations may apply due to commercial confidentiality, contractual arrangements and the nature of technical review documents.

 The City regularly receives and assesses a wide range of environmental management plans and event applications and has internal officers experienced in assessing environmental management information in accordance with relevant legislation and standards. Given the high level of public interest in this proposal, the environmental assessment will also be independently peer reviewed by a suitably qualified, local environmental consultant to provide additional assurance 

At this stage, the City intends to communicate the key findings, proposed mitigation measures and any approval conditions.

The City advised that the proposal is still only at the leasing stage. Which staff in the City’s environmental department are qualified to know to refer this event to the Federal Environmental Minister Re. Black cockatoos and other threatened/vulnerable species under a “Matter of National Environmental Significance” EPBC Act?

The City is satisfied that relevant Officers are suitably qualified and will not share individuals personal details. However, to provide additional assurance, an independent peer review will also be undertaken by a suitably qualified third-party environmental consultant as part of the assessment process.

Further, a pre-referral meeting has been held with officers from Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) to discuss the proposal, including potential impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES), as well as proposed avoidance and mitigation measures and the self-assessment of any potential significant impacts.

Based on information received to date, the proposal is considered to present a low environmental impact and is not expected to result in significant effects, such as vegetation clearing, impacts/removal of any threatened species, or other material disturbance to the site’s ecological values.

As we noted, the Referral Guidelines for the three (3) WA threatened black cockatoo species: 

a) Self-referral and 

b) Refer the proposal to the Minister

The City has mentioned that as part of the procurement process there would be a peer reviewed environmental assessment for the proponent's report. 

Could we have more information on this process including an explanation of how this would work?

The City is procuring an independent environmental consultant to peer review the ecological assessment, focusing on the methodology, conclusions and proposed mitigation measures, the process undertaken is following the City's standard procurement practices.

Who will conduct this peer review?

The procurement process is still underway.

When will the public be permitted access to the peer review?

The independent peer review will be undertaken by a suitably qualified third-party consultant to provide additional assurance to the City as part of its assessment process. Consistent with standard practice, these types of technical reviews are not typically released for public access.

Jorgensen Park is being used for two (2) environmental offsets – Ray Owen reserve and realignment of Canning Road. The second offset is within the proposed exclusive, commercial private event area. Can you explain how environmental offset allocation and exclusive commercial event align?

The offset projects are still in the planning phase and are subject to future funding and delivery timeframes. Based on current information, there will be no overlap or conflict between the timing or location of the offsets and the proposed event.

In addition, the event has been designed to be low impact and to work with the existing landscape. Activities are focused on areas that are already highly used and disturbed, such as established paths and locations with existing foot and dog traffic, to minimise any additional environmental impact.

The City will continue to ensure that both the event and any future offset works are managed appropriately and do not conflict.

When will the NDA confidentiality period for the event name end? You advised that it is up to Kzemos - when is this likely?

The City has requested that the confidentiality provisions relating to the event name and intellectual property be lifted or narrowed as soon as possible to enable greater transparency. At this stage, the timing remains a matter for the proponent and its licensing arrangements, and the City cannot yet confirm when those restrictions may end.

The City advised that the NDA was for the event name and intellectual property. Why were the City and Councillors initially unable to respond to other questions about this proposal if the NDA was not comprehensive in coverage?

While the NDA relates primarily to the event name and intellectual property, the City was also limited in what it could confirm publicly while contractual arrangements and operational planning remained incomplete. As matters have become more settled, the City has sought to progressively provide additional information about process, access and assessment requirements.

When will the public be able to view the public submissions to the CEO (closing date 13/03/2026)?

A summary of the volume, key themes and summarised submissions will be presented to Council at the April Ordinary Council Meeting. Because submissions contain personal and identifiable information, the full submissions will be provided to Elected Members under confidential cover in accordance with the City’s usual practices.

Who will pay for the bus charters for ferrying event attendees to the event, as per City staff's commitment at the close resident's meeting (held on 5:30pm on 13/03/2026)?

This is not a City-run event. All costs associated with the event, including any bus charters for transporting attendees, are the responsibility of the proponent.

Who carries the risk/liability for all areas, including:

- environmental including wildlife risk and resue, rehabilitation, rehabilitation of flora and tree planting, clean up of area after each nightly event. A trained wildlife expert on site nightly and each morning to rescue and attended any affected or injured wildlife?

-patrons health and safety

- parking and traffic

- bus charter 

The proponent is responsible for the risks, costs and operational requirements associated with the event, including environmental management, rehabilitation, patron safety, transport and traffic implementation. Separately, the City’s role is to assess the proposal, require appropriate plans and controls, and ensure compliance with any approval conditions before the event could proceed, and also during to ensure ongoing compliance.

Which were the 3 or 4 or so other locations in the City of Kalamunda which were rejected? On what basis were they deemed unacceptable?

At the proponent’s request, a number of alternative locations within the City were explored at a high level, including both public and private land options. They were not progressed because they did not meet the specific physical and operational requirements of the event.

Which other LGAs rejected the proposal?

The City is not in a position to comment on discussions the proponent may have had with other local governments nor the outcomes of those discussions.

What is the projected financial benefit to the City for the cost of holding this event?

Detailed commercial terms remain confidential at this stage. However, the proposal is expected to provide lease consideration to the City, in addition to broader local economic benefits associated with visitation, employment and spending. The City will release further information where it is able to do so.

What is the projected financial loss to the City?

The City is not expected to incur direct event delivery costs, as those costs are to be borne by the proponent. Internal officer time associated with assessment, regulation and compliance will be managed within existing resources.

Will all profits made by the City (including the lease component), be re-invested into Jorgensen Park? 

The proposal at this time includes remedial improvements to the existing trail, including re-grading and the placement of gravel to improve surface condition, drainage, and usability for the event and beyond. The works would provide ongoing public benefit by enhancing accessibility and safety for users, reduce ongoing maintenance requirements, and provide a more durable all-weather surface.

These works had been identified within the City’s long term planning as future infrastructure improvements however were unfunded.

Are recent hospitality job advertisements related to the proposed Jorgensen Park event?

The City is aware that community members have seen hospitality job advertisements referring to an “immersive outdoor event” in Kalamunda.

The City is not involved in, nor does it have visibility of, the event proponent’s recruitment or commercial arrangements. These activities are managed independently by the proponent.

Importantly, any external activity undertaken by the proponent does not indicate that the City has completed its assessment or made a decision in relation to the proposed temporary lease of a portion of Jorgensen Park.

The proposal remains under review. No lease has been executed and no final decision has been made.

Should the proposal proceed, it would still be subject to all required approvals, including Ministerial consent and a formal event approval process.

Will the Ecological Assessment be released publicly?

The Ecological Assessment has been prepared by an independent third-party consultant. It is not standard practice to release these reports for public distribution at this stage, and the consultant’s approval would be required as the report remains their intellectual property.

The assessment has been reviewed by suitably qualified City officers and referred to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER).

To provide an additional level of assurance, the City will also engage an independent environmental consultant to undertake a peer review.

This forms part of the overall assessment process to ensure all environmental considerations are thoroughly examined.

The City will continue to provide updates as the process progresses.

What approvals are required, and how does the process work?

The City’s approvals process is being undertaken in two stages:

1. Land tenure (lease and licences)

The City may consider a short-term lease of Crown land it manages, where permitted under its Management Order, subject to Ministerial consent under the Land Administration Act 1997.

The proposal also involves adjacent unallocated Crown land. Access to these areas requires separate licences issued by the State as landowner. This process is managed independently of the City.

2. Event approvals

The event approval process is separate and includes:

• assessment of the Event Management Plan and supporting documentation
• approvals for temporary structures and electrical installations
• final inspection and certification prior to operation

The proponent is required to submit detailed documentation, including:

• risk and emergency management plans
• ecological and environmental management plans
• noise and lighting management plans
• traffic and transport management plans
• waste management plans
• relevant permits (e.g. food and liquor)

This documentation is currently under review.

Timing and dependencies

Land tenure must be resolved before the event can proceed.

Event approvals are dependent on land tenure being in place and sufficient documentation being provided.

The City is progressing this process in a staged and coordinated manner to ensure all statutory requirements are met.

----

Updated FAQs - 14 April 2026

Has the City received the event management plan?

Yes. The City has now received the event management plan from the proponent, along with a suite of supporting documents, including:

• Noise and Lighting Management Plan
• Traffic and Transport Management Plan
• Emergency Management Plan
• Risk Management Plan
• Waste Management Plan

These documents are currently under review and will be referred to relevant State agencies for input as part of the assessment process.
---

Updated FAQs - 31 March 2026

Has an ecological assessment been completed, and what does it say?

Yes. The City has received an Ecological Assessment for the proposed temporary lease area.

Protecting the environment is a key priority. The assessment considers vegetation, wildlife, lighting and site restoration during and after the event.

A high-level summary of the assessment indicates:

• the site has high ecological value, including habitat for black cockatoos and hollow-dependent species
• the proposal is for a temporary event, primarily located on existing trails, avoiding the need for clearing
• no lighting is proposed for tree hollows, roost trees or dense habitat areas
• the event is limited to evening hours and supported by a range of mitigation measures

The assessment concludes that significant long-term environmental impacts are unlikely, provided the recommended management controls are implemented.

The assessment and proposed mitigation measures are currently being reviewed by the City’s Natural Areas team and will also be subject to independent external review.

If the proposal proceeds, monitoring would be undertaken during the event, with adaptive management measures implemented if required.

---

FAQs - Originally Published 4 March 2026

The City has received a range of questions from the community regarding the proposed temporary lease of a portion of Jorgensen Park.

This page has been updated following the recent community information session and reflects the key themes and questions we are hearing.

The statutory public notice period for the proposed lease has now closed.

All submissions received will be considered as part of the decision-making process.

What exactly is the event proposed?

At this stage we’re not able to publicly name the event due to a commercial confidentiality agreement with the event proponent.

What we can share is that it is a ticketed, family-friendly evening experience designed for visitors to walk through and enjoy the natural setting of the Hills.

More details will be shared as soon as we are legally able to do so (weeks not months!).

Why can’t the City just tell us what it is?

We understand many people are curious about the experience proposed for Jorgensen Park.

The reason is that the event proponent has a commercial confidentiality agreement in place while contractual arrangements, licensing and operational planning are finalised.

This is common practice for major international experiences, particularly where intellectual property and licensing arrangements are involved.

The City will share further information as soon as it is legally able to do so.

Has Council already approved this, and has the lease been signed or is it proceeding on 6 April?

No. The lease has not been signed and no final decision has been made.

The City issued a Public Notice because the Local Government Act 1995 requires community comment to be invited before entering into the proposed lease. All submissions received during the public notice period are currently being reviewed and will help inform the final decision.

The date of 6 April referenced in the public notice is the earliest possible commencement date, should all required processes, approvals and considerations be completed. It is not a confirmed start date.

At its meeting on 24 February 2026, Council delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to progress the statutory process, including the ability to execute a lease of this nature.

The Chief Executive Officer will circulate the officer report and submissions received in response to the public notice for the proposed temporary lease of a portion of Jorgensen Park to the Mayor and Councillors for their review, and will consider their feedback before determining whether to proceed.

No lease will be executed unless all required processes have been completed.

Why was the public comment period only 14 days?

The 14-day submission period is a statutory requirement under the Local Government Act 1995 for proposals involving the lease of public land.

The public notice period has now closed. Submissions received are being reviewed and will be considered as part of the decision-making process.

Will the whole park be closed?

No. The proposed lease relates to a defined portion of Jorgensen Park, not the entire park. The below map indicates the event footprint (red line) and the Park's perimeter (yellow line). 

What about impacts on residents?

If the proposal proceeds, the City will require management measures relating to:

• traffic and parking
• visitor movement
• safety
• noise management
• waste and cleaning

The City will continue to work directly with nearby residents and impacted park users.

How will dog walkers and regular park users be affected?

Jorgensen Park is well used by the community for recreation, including walking and dog exercise.

If the proposal proceeds:

• some areas may be temporarily restricted
• alternative access to other parts of the park would remain available
• restrictions would only apply during the event period

Is the event going to be loud?

No. This is not a concert, music festival or bush doof. The proposed event is designed to complement the natural environment rather than create loud entertainment.

Why Jorgensen Park?

Jorgensen Park offers a unique natural setting with bushland surrounds and accessibility close to the Kalamunda town centre.

What about traffic and parking?

If the proposal proceeds, traffic and parking management will be a key part of planning.

Measures would include alternate transport options, monitoring peak periods, signage and operational management.

What about wildlife and the environment?

Environmental protection is a key consideration.

If the proposal proceeds, environmental assessments and management plans will be required, including protection of vegetation, wildlife and restoration of the site.

Is the City selling the park?

No. Jorgensen Park remains Crown land vested to the care and control of the City.

This proposal relates only to a temporary lease of a portion of the park.

How can I have my say?

The formal public notice period has now closed.

Community members are still welcome to contact the City if they have questions, would like further information, or wish to speak with staff.

Additional questions following the community information session

Following the information session held on 13 March, we have added further questions based on feedback and discussions with the community.

We will continue to update this page as further information becomes available.

Can the City extend the 14-day statutory consultation period?

The 14-day public notice period is a requirement under the Local Government Act 1995.

While the formal period has now concluded, community members are still welcome to contact the City with questions or to request further information.

Will the City hold another public meeting with Councillors in attendance?

The City has not scheduled any further public meetings at this time.

A small information session was held on 13 March for nearby residents.

Community members are still welcome to contact the City or attend a Council meeting to ask a question in accordance with meeting procedures.

Will this set a precedent?

Each proposal involving public land is assessed on its own merits.

Any future proposals would be subject to their own statutory processes and approvals.

Where else can we walk our dog off-leash?

Jorgensen Park is one of a number of locations within the City where dogs can be exercised.

If the proposal proceeds, only a defined portion of the park would be temporarily restricted, with the majority of the park remaining accessible to the public, including for off-lead dog exercise.

Based on current planning, approximately 70–80% of Jorgensen Park is expected to remain accessible, noting final figures will be confirmed once the lease area is finalised. The City will then provide a map to clearly show the proposed restricted area and the areas that will remain accessible, including for dog walkers.

The City also has a network of 24 gazetted off-lead dog exercise areas and three enclosed dog parks across the district, which will continue to be available.

Nearby alternative off-lead areas within close proximity include:

• Old Railway Reserve (various sections between Williams, Elizabeth, Tella, Collins and Lesmurdie Roads)

• Old Yorna Road Reserve (corner of Alpine and Bird Roads)

• Ledger Road Reserve (noting some temporary limitations due to a separate event)

If you are seeking alternative locations, information on dog exercise areas across the City is available on our website:
https://www.kalamunda.wa.gov.au/residents/pets-livestock/dogs-cats

What about impacts on wildlife such as magpies?

Environmental and wildlife considerations are part of the assessment process.

If the proposal proceeds, management measures will be required to minimise impacts.

What about breeding seasons?

Environmental assessments will consider seasonal impacts, including breeding periods, and appropriate mitigation measures will be required.

How much has the City spent on this process?

The City incurs standard internal costs when assessing proposals.

Commercial arrangements, including cost recovery, are considered as part of lease negotiations and are not finalised unless the proposal proceeds.

Why is the City considering this proposal?

The City regularly receives proposals for the use of public land.

Each proposal is assessed through statutory, environmental and operational processes before any decision is made.

Is Jorgensen Park a Class A Reserve?

No. Jorgensen Park is a Class C Crown Reserve.

Under the Land Administration Act 1997, Class C reserves may be leased subject to approvals.

Are State or Commonwealth approvals required?

Based on current assessments, the proposal is not expected to trigger Commonwealth approvals.

No extensive clearing is anticipated, and existing paths will be used where possible.

Environmental assessments will address potential impacts, including foot traffic.

What about dieback?

Dieback is already present in large parts of Jorgensen Park.

If the proposal proceeds, management measures such as hygiene controls and wash-down stations may be required to minimise spread.

---

For further information or to speak with City staff, please contact:

enquiries@kalamunda.wa.gov.au